Monitoring
Toxic Body Loads in Children
By Anne Stanton
Some extremely poisonous
substances have been multiplying in our global ecosystem for the last
60 years,[1] which now means four or five generations of humanity
have been assimilating these new poisons. Today, babies are born carrying
a “toxic body load”.[2]
These children then struggle to develop normally in an environment riddled
with sources of toxic exposure. If you were in charge, what would you
do about it?
In
Australia, all federal health-monitoring initiatives seem stalled by
budgetary limitations, and those in charge cite lack of local
scientific data as an excuse for inaction. As the information age gains
momentum, these excuses are wearing a little thin! A global focus is
needed. Projects already underway in the US, Europe and Canada are tracking
the effects of environmental exposures on childhood
asthma and cancer, as well as children’s learning, growth and development.
The statistics are so disturbing that Australia needs to take
action now.
Asthma,
Cancer, Emotional Illness and Developmental Disorders
In
the US, the
Environmental Health and Safety Task Force is concentrating on four
areas - asthma, injuries, cancer and developmental disorders. The
Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health (CCCEH) at Columbia University, sponsored
a conference this year on "The Health of our Children in the Urban
Environment".[3] Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher,
told the delegates that public health is based on the principle that
responding to the most vulnerable members of the population, especially
children, is the best way to protect the nation's health.
CCCEH
has been conducting studies on mothers and their babies in the immediate
neighborhood of Columbia University, in Northern Manhattan. They are
pioneering the use of biomarkers - molecular changes in blood
or urine - to track the effects of environmental exposures. Preliminary
results showed that air quality tests suggest virtually universal exposure
to two toxic pesticides during pregnancy. Biomarkers in maternal blood
and blood of the umbilical cord showed high rates of exposure to allergens,
air pollutants and secondhand tobacco smoke.
In
the UK, the Department of Health predicts that one in seven British
children will be taking prescribed drugs to control their behaviour
by 2007.[4] Other statistics
are just as disturbing. At present, it is estimated, one in five children
has a mental or emotional illness at any given time, while one in 20
suffer from depression.
New
guidelines issued this year by the British Government's medicines watchdog,
the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice), contained further
disturbing news about the drug Ritalin, a treatment for attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nice has reported that far from being
over prescribed, as many critics allege, the drug is under prescribed.
In 1994, 4,000 prescriptions for Ritalin were made out to children.
Since then, the amount of prescriptions has been doubling every year.
Last year, it leveled off, increasing from 126,500 prescriptions to
157,900. But Nice suggests that in England and Wales, there are another
48,000 children who should be on Ritalin.
The
Health of Canada's Children is the name of a report issued recently
by the Canadian Institute of Child Health.[5]
While standards exist for many environmental contaminants, they are
designed to protect 155-pound (70-kilogram) adults, not 15-pound (seven-kilogram)
children, and their cumulative impact is largely unknown, the report
notes. Dr. Graham Chance, chairman of the advisory group that oversaw
publication of the report, believes the situation in Canada is critical.
We
are exposed to this soup of chemicals, but we don't know the cumulative,
long-term effects on our children's health," he said. "There
are major gaps in our knowledge, and we can't afford to allow that situation
to persist. Statistics in Canada mirror those in other developed nations.
According to the report, there has been a 25% increase in the rate of
childhood cancers in the past 25 years. Certain types of cancers have
risen dramatically, including acute lymphocytic leukemia, tumours of
the central nervous system and bone tumours. All of them are believed
to be influenced, at least in part, by exposure to environmental contaminants.
Sources of pollutants examined in the report include building materials
such as insulation and particleboard, upholstery and furnishing, appliances
such as gas stoves and kerosene heaters, cleaning agents, second-hand
smoke and pesticides. The authors also speculate that there may be a
link between attention and other learning disabilities and exposure
to environmental contaminants, and notes that "most substances
to which children are exposed regularly, such as food additives and
pesticides, have not been evaluated for their potential to affect brain
development."
Wake
Up Australia
Children
are the ideal target population for health monitoring, since some very
good basic data can be collected through schools and local GPs, not
to mention parents. Australian children are clearly not immune to environmental
contaminants, as our public health statistics show. Yet most Australians
are still unaware of the danger to their children’s health.
Dr.
Trevor Hancock, chairman of the Canadian Association of Physicians for
the Environment, asserts that the public must take the impact of environmental
contamination on children more seriously. He said that it is illogical
that people who would not dream of abusing a child think nothing of
passing on to their children and grandchildren an environment that has
been abused.
"The environment
is perhaps the ultimate determinant of our health and the health of
our children. Yet over the course of the past century we have radically
altered the environment in which children develop -- starting in the
womb, their first environment," he writes.
"Today's children
are born with a body burden of synthetic, persistent organic pollutants
- the consequences of which will not be known for another 50 years or
so."
The Health of Canada's
Children, Dr. Trevor Hancock, chairman of the Canadian
Association of Physicians for the Environment
FOOTNOTES
[1] Dr. John Pollak, in his book The Toxicity
of Chemical Mixtures (CHAST & PIAC 1993), estimates that between
50,000 - 100,000 chemicals are now in common use. The quantities of chemicals
produced has also skyrocketed. In the 1930's, about one million tonnes
of organic or carbon-based chemicals were produced annually. By 1950,
production was 7 million tonnes/year; by 1985 it was 250 million tonnes/year.
Based on these figures, Pollak estimates that annual production of organic
chemicals will double every 7-8 years.
[3] Urban Babies Loaded with Environmental Toxins by Cameron la Follette
[4] Do we need to drug our children?
by Deborah Orr, Columnist Of The Year
UK
Press, Independent: 1st November 2000
[5] Toxic soup may be choking our kids, study
finds Andre Picard, THE GLOBE AND MAIL August 22, 2000
|